“Justice” Sandra Day’s Supreme Con Job

“Justice” Sandra Day’s Supreme Con Job

This installment shall prove, once and for all, the three branches of the US corporate government established by its constitution are holographic structures designed to perform nothing more than theatrical gestures.

Though American history texts herald the US constitution as a living testament to America’s “freedom”, in truth, it replaced the Articles of Confederation, which did not make provisions for a central banking concern, and resulted from legal negotiations between sworn Esquires of the Crown Temple – who were also holders of allodial land titles in the American colonies – and King George III who, while acting under the guise of first American president “George Washington”, was an agent of London’s Crown Temple.

The following information shall not only serve to expose yet another renowned and award-winning Hollywood actor in the role of a Supreme Court Justice, but further explain what specific government agencies, in cooperation with London’s Crown Temple and the Vatican, are really in control of the US corporation, rendering the three branches of government you may have learned about in public school’s civics class superfluous.

Indeed, Sandra Day O’Connor’s presence on the land’s highest court was merely a symbolic gesture, and as shall be demonstrated, those legal decisions that become reported as landmark templates of the American judicial system are not truly decided by the Justices sitting on the bench in Washington D.C., but in New York, which is licensed to be the prime legal franchise for the Inner Temple of the Crown in London, where all of the legal principals, judges, et al., are legal representatives called to the Bar of the Crown’s Middle Temple.

As for “Justice” Sandra Day O’Connor, she was yet another fabricated historical character portrayed by an esteemed Hollywood host actor – a name with which loyal readers are likely already familiar.  Continue reading ““Justice” Sandra Day’s Supreme Con Job”

Marlon Brando: Godfather of Hollywood chameleons?

Marlon Brando: Godfather of Hollywood chameleons?

Why do so many so desperately wish to be entertained?

What grand appeal is there for those content to live and die vicariously through celluloid heroes while like children, they sit sheltered in the dark from the dangers of the outside world, in utter thrall before the imaginary, but comforting world of the silver screen?

Could it be, the darkness of the theater serves as a welcomed reprieve, perhaps even a psychological womb for those anonymously huddled together in desperate escape, while collectively hoping the light shed upon them from the mammoth silver screen will bring order to the world they’ve been conditioned to perceive as cold, unforgiving, and unpredictably chaotic?

The celebrity icons featured upon the silver screen – whether cast in the roles of heroes or villains – become worshipful, iconic vessels, mirror-like images upon which the masses project generalized idealizations, consisting of their fearful insecurities or perceivable virtues.

Marlon Brando represented one such icon who, for decades, generations of movie critics and audiences held in the highest esteem. Nevertheless, is it possible the name Marlon Brando was yet another pseudonym created to mask Hollywood’s rampant nepotism?

This installment shall connect this Hollywood legend with another actor and television star alleged to have recently died and with the current Russian Premiere, Vladimir Putin.

Stay tuned, folks. Continue reading “Marlon Brando: Godfather of Hollywood chameleons?”