Former US president “George H.W. Bush” is rumored to have once uttered, “If the American people knew what we have done, they would string us up from the lamp posts.”

In fairness, though this quote is often sourced to an alleged interview conducted by former White House press correspondent Sarah McClendon, there appears to be no first- hand account or documentation – a common discovery when sources of such well-repeated historical anecdotes are investigated – which corroborates Bush’s remarks or that such an interview between the former US president and McClendon ever took place.

Nevertheless, remarks of this kind serve to provide ample and dramatic illustration of the sinister methods of subversive operation employed by the thirteen, ruling elite Jesuit families, and are particularly applicable when considering the grand implications of Post-Modern Reality Simulation.

Unlike the unconfirmed remarks of “George H.W. ‘Poppy’ Bush” however, both the results and the source of the published research that follows are certainly and without question well-substantiated.

The conclusions revealed in this installment will undoubtedly, even to those considered loyal readers and visitors, seem highly controversial and, perhaps, even met with no small measure of incredulous outrage.

So be it!

What if, you were to learn, the man calling himself your “elected” president had not only been president before, but had “died” and “resurrected” several decades ago, and went on to portray a famous array of well-known historical characters?

Suppose, you were to also learn this man not only belonged to a powerful European royal family, but a royal family among the world’s most powerful of the thirteen ruling elite royal houses – the Grimaldi of Genoa, Italy and the Principality of Monaco?

In the past, during the campaign run-up to the quadrennial US presidential elections traditionally held in November, the MSM, related publications, and periodicals have been known to leak curious bits of information regarding the royal heritage – however distantly, they always insist – of a number of viably promoted candidates.

The New York Times, in an article published back on July 5 of 1988 and headlined “Bush, They Say, Is Indeed a Connecticut Yankee From King Henry’s Court”, skirted with references to George H.W. ‘Poppy’ Bush’s genealogical relations – documented by Burke’s Peerage – to British royalty and specifically, to the House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha.

SEE: https://www.nytimes.com/1988/07/05/us/bush-they-say-is-indeed-a-connecticut-yankee-from-king-henry-s-court.html

As observed in the footage featured in the video, displayed above, Poppy’s alleged son, George W. Bush Junior (W=M/3/EE/33/high-degree Scottish Rite Freemasonry), is attending a dinner hosted by the reigning British monarch, Queen Elizabeth II (AKA Lucille Ball/and a slew of other characters, SEE: The Rockefellers and Their Phony Feminists ) with PM Tony Blair (AKA Charles Alden Black Junior/and a slew of popular culture/music industry characters) also dutifully in attendance.

SEE: Chris Cornell’s Jesus Christ Death Pose

SEE: Has Freddie Mercury Kept Himself Alive?

As we’ve learned from our research into the concept of Post-Modern Reality Simulation, those famous public figures – whether Hollywood celebrities, popular music recording stars, politicians, and others in many fields of human endeavor – with which the general public have become familiar and, in many cases, even come to admire are, in truth, theatrical character conversion schemes portrayed by an array of well-disguised (and some not so well-disguised) host actors.

The major actors perpetuating the character conversion schemes of Post-Modern Reality Simulation – through extensive and empirically-based analysis – have proved to possess aristocratic heritage or direct relations to European royal families. The official histories of some of these families, as it turns out, serve as grand historical blinds, facades created to veil the genuine identities of the true perpetrators of history’s sinister character conversion schemes: the thirteen, ruling elite families sitting at the very summit of the Templar/Jesuit/Masonic global pyramid.

Yes folks, in the final analysis – when it comes to considering the authenticity of the US presidential “elections”, and even the candidates themselves – it is all a scripted masquerade, tantamount to a “reality” television series.

And, as we all know, “Donald Trump” was once the star of his own such television production.

Now however, it is high time the American people summon the requisite fortitude and vociferously inform both the sitting US president and, as well, the entire rogue’s gallery of his oppositional presidential candidates: YOU’RE FIRED!

Nevertheless, as we’ve also discovered, those family names with which the public has also become more than familiar, names which have become synonymous with the very concepts of wealth and power – Rockefeller, Kennedy, Bush, Clinton, Nixon, and even Rothschild (a family history to be explored in another installment coming soon!) –  have proved, like the royal actors who’ve publicly portrayed their scripted histories, to also have been character scheme simulations and scripted historical constructs, family pseudonyms designed to hide the idenities of those that truly rule over the US corporation.

THE GRIMALDI

Though a thumbnail history of the Grimaldi family has been provided in past installments, here, we shall allow our examination to delve a bit more deeply.

Historically, the history of the Grimaldi is closely related to that of the Republic of Genoa, Italy, to France, and to the history of the Principality of Monaco. The Grimaldi family history can be traced back to the medieval historical period of the 13th century, to Francesco Grimaldi who, while utilizing a bit of military-styled psychological warfare, became Lord of Monaco, backed by an army of mercenaries disguised as Franciscan monks, a Catholic religious order whose own history is closely tied-in with that of the Jesuit order, a clerical order with a rich history of its own.

Yes folks, for over 800 years, the “Society of Jesus” has been in complete control of three powerful principalities, the Vatican in Rome, the Crown Temple in the City of London, and the District of Columbia, here in America.

As for Lord Francesco Grimaldi, he was a noble lord presiding over the princely House of Guelph, an aristocratic house with family ties extending beyond medieval Italy’s boundaries and into France and Germany which, beginning around the 13th century, became embroiled in a long-standing dispute with another royal house – known to history as the Ghibellines – ostensibly over the extent of papal power in Rome.

GUELPH AND GHIBELLINE

The documented historical dispute between the powerful aristocratic families of the Guelph and Ghibelline can best be characterized as a dialectical political struggle between powerful French, German, and Italian aristocrats, bankers and commercial merchants (The Guelphs) who supported the prevailing political and temporal powers of the Papacy, and those factions of the noble and royal families who supported the imperial sovereignty presided over by the elected rulers of the Holy Roman Empire (The Ghibellines).

Among the Ghibellines, were the German aristocratic House of Swabia, an ancient Austro-German principality synonymous with the royal genealogy of the von Furstenberg family.

Our extensive research into prominent members of the von Furstenberg family has demonstrated they are but one ancient royal bloodline who, along with the Casiraghi-Grimaldi of Monaco, have played major roles influencing America’s history. Members hailing from both royal family lines have occupied executive positions at the White House, the uppermost echelons of corporate boardrooms, Hollywood’s cinema/music industry entertainment complex, and chief positions in other major industries throughout the 20th and 21st centuries and, time and again, have demonstrated themselves to be among the most notorious perpetrators of Post-Modern Reality Simulation.

Comparatively – concerning the struggle between the oppositional factions of the Guelph and Ghibelline during the medieval historical period – we may find accounts of such historical upheavals analogous to the dialectical struggle played out today on American shores, between Democrats and Republicans, what is commonly characterized as the ongoing political struggle between what appear to be the ideological extremes of left and right.

After the establishment of the Crown Temple in the City of London by the 13th century – which has always been under the complete control of the military order of the Jesuits, the Praetorian Guard of the vested interests of Europe’s most powerful royal families of Italy, France, Britain and Austro-Germany – the Jesuit order was able to manipulate, through the issuance of interest bearing financial loans, both sides of history’s revolutionary conflicts.

Those factions belonging to the lower noble and aristocratic ranks of the Guelph and Ghibelline, were forced into a fierce dialectical and oppositional struggle that worked to the supreme advantage of the ruling Jesuit families (sound like a familiar method of operation, folks?).

With sterling patience over time, while stage-managing the dialectical struggle between the warring factions of Europe’s  lower nobility, the ruling thirteen families were able to completely synthesize their complete control over both the Vatican principality and the sovereignty of the Holy Roman Empire.

The Holy Roman Empire still exists today under the geopolitical and symbolic veil of the United Nations, which was formulated and established during the post-World War II historical period as a political tool to be judiciously utilized by the thirteen, ruling elite Jesuit families to maximize and ensure the effectiveness of their socio-geopolitical agendas.

These are the families – including the Grimaldi of Genoa, Italy and Monaco – that founded America as a corporate, joint-stock commercial venture to be economically exploited and utilized as a geopolitical military police force.

These families are still America’s hidden rulers and, undeniably, one of their genealogical descendants is currently posed as not only a major candidate in the current campaign for the 2020 US presidency but, simultaneously, is also posed in the characterization of the current US president.

WHO IS JOE BIDEN?

Not many may be familiar with the political career of Joe Robinette Biden Junior, other than the fact he served as the 47th US vice president during the tenure of the Obama administration.

Prior to this, and according to his official biographies, Biden also represented the state of Delaware in the US Senate from 1973 until 2009. Certainly, there are those who’ve already recognized the presence of numerology related to the official chronology of Biden’s political career. First, you may have noticed the telltale number of 47, which is a hidden reference to Freemasonry and the 47th Proposition of Euclid. Euclid’s 47th Proposition – as masonic legend would have it – is said to feature prominently in what are termed “Past Master’s Jewels.” Euclid’s Proposition – also according to Freemason lore – was found to have first been mentioned in a text called Anderson’s Constitutions, which was published in 1723.

The text is said to not only have mentioned the Past Master’s Jewels by name, but goes on to explain its significance within the sacred craft of Freemasonry: “The Greater Pythagoras, provided the Author of the 47th Proposition of Euclid’s first Book, which, if duly observed, is the Foundation of all Masonry, sacred, civil, and military.”

The 47th Proposition is synonymous with the Euclidean and geometric equation of A2+B2=C2, an equation that, though attributed to Pythagoras’s discovery and proofs, is documented as having been used by the ancient Egyptians, predating the time period when stone masons utilized the equation as a mathematical and architectural basis with which to properly structure the foundational basis for the building of Europe’s cathedrals during the middle ages. Symbolic reference to Euclid’s 47th Proposition is traditionally made during the initiation of a blue lodge freemasonic candidate’s entrance into the 3rd degree of master mason, when he is symbolically required to “square the lodge.”

However, if we are able to take a closer look at the masonic symbol for Euclid’s 47th Proposition, would we recognize anything familiar, as it relates to a famous and well-recognizable corporate logo?

Masonic symbol, Euclid’s 47th Proposition:

https://binged.it/2Z9xiDw

Mickey Mouse/Disney logo:

https://binged.it/2ZfMFtY

Yes folks, with the display of their traditional “Mickey Mouse” logo, Disney has, for decades, been covertly signaling to the general public just who it is they are affiliated with – the Freemasons. And – of course – the double M, in gematria, sums to the number 33, which is the highest degree of Scottish Rite freemasonry. It is likely most of you also noticed the numerological significance of the official dates listed as Biden’s tenure in the US Senate – 1973 to 2009.

First, we have the number 73 or 3 7’s/777/intelligence joker code and, secondarily, the number of 19, the Jesuit number of the Sun or the symbolic Eye of Horus. The year of 2009 sums to 11, a number symbolic of the twin masonic pillars of Boaz and Jachin, symbolical objects which are to be found in every masonic lodge in the US.

Based upon the conspicuous numerological markers present in the official biographies of “Joe Biden” – as with the hidden symbolic significance of Disney’s ubiquitous Mickey Mouse logo – it is clear the public is being given a covert message: those at the highest levels of the Freemasonic order know indeed who hides behind the character’s carefully crafted mask.

Referring back, for a moment, to the symbol of Euclid’s 47th Proposition, could this equation serve a larger purpose, other than as a mere reference to the geometry used by medieval stone masons and to those rituals held during blue lodge masonic initiations? Could it also exist as an equational blueprint for the building of a fabricated character scheme like those, for example, of “Joe Biden” and the current US president, “Donald Trump”?

If the results of extensive comparative image analysis are any confirming indication, then the answer to both the former and latter queries is affirmative.

Indeed, the geometric equational components of Euclid’s 47th Proposition work on a deeper symbolic level, and its triad of coefficients symbolically represent the variables of a concocted biography (confirmed by anonymous third parties), added to a fabricated pseudonym; the mason stone bricks used to build elaborate cathedrals of lies that when laid in a precise manner, equal the sum of a theatrically oriented character conversion scheme, a theatrical portrayal which can be further elaborated upon and, through the power of historical narrative, built into an archetypical hero, legend, or in the case of “Jeffery Epstein”, a reviled villain.

Results of extensive ear biometric and facial recognition analysis have determined the man behind the mask of both Joe Biden, the former US vice president and current 2020 presidential candidate, and Donald Trump, the current US president is, without doubt, Prince Stefano Casiraghi Grimaldi of the Principality of Monaco who, though he was alleged to have died in a boating accident off the coast of France in the English Channel during the era of the early 1980’s, has also portrayed former US president George H.W. Bush and mainstream newscaster, NBC’s Brian Williams.

When studying the following images, look very carefully at the architecture of the eyes in proximal geometric relation to the surrounding noses and brow ridges. Though the ears are a perfect comparative match between all the following images, the eyes, in this case, are the telltale clue both characters are portrayed by the identical host actor. It also appears, Donald Trump’s character has been augmented with an especially designed hair piece and smatterings of latex facial stippling that have been strategically applied to the areas of the chin, jaw line, and underneath the eyes to aid the concealment of his host actor, Stefano Casiraghi.

Joe Biden:

https://binged.it/2Z8efJD

https://binged.it/2Z7zVFT

Donald Trump:

https://binged.it/30bgXLW

https://binged.it/30eHckt

Brian Williams:

https://binged.it/30f0J4j

https://binged.it/2Z5us2r

Prince Stefano Casiraghi:

https://binged.it/308FUHL

https://binged.it/30dy1AU

George H.W. Bush:

https://binged.it/30g6cbc

https://binged.it/30hRssg

 

 

 

 

3 thoughts on “Actors Starring as 2020 Presidential Candidates? Part II

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s