As yet, many do not subscribe to the concept of the actor based reality.
Rather, those shrinking from such a notion do so either out of ideological blindness, adherence to social pressures despite some lingering subconscious inkling, or from the deleterious effects suffered at the hands of repeated exposure to corporate television programming.
Still others cannot conceive of the actor based reality because they claim there exists a dearth of empirical evidence presented here at Newsspell to support the very idea – of what to them – seems such an outlandish and perhaps even preposterous notion. Even despite presenting such incredulous doubters with empirical examples and direct links to sources demonstrating the US is a commercial corporation ruled over by London’s Crown Temple, rather than heed the cue and corroborate such evidence for themselves, they choose to first smear the researcher as a “liar”, then perhaps in an even more cowardly fashion, do so anonymously then quickly abscond back into the comfortable womb of their digital rabbit warrens.
Nevertheless, and yet again, one shall proceed in this installment to argue a convincing case that yet another of America’s “elected” presidents was indeed an actor operating under a pseudonym, and that by empirical implication, the very pseudonym this character has utilized to fool the American people may be no more legitimate than that of the historically vaunted “Kennedy” family moniker.
Be that as it may, one manages, once again, to peel back the masking layers of deception.
Come with me now, on an adventurous and revealing ride that just may – by the end – leave one psychologically and emotionally scarred, and yet ultimately emerge no worse, and perhaps even better for having suffered.
Indeed, there are no primrose paths leading to the perilous summit of triumphant truth.