Featured Image -- 4687

I apologize in advance for the tone. But in a jaded and increasingly cynical age, when attention spans are shorter than the last television commercial, one finds such an approach is sometimes necessary!


Did that get your attention, perhaps rupture your social media womb long enough to face some reality? It is high time for humanity to reconsider history, to reconsider what they’ve been told to believe by politicians, priests, and professors, for they have fed you falsehoods, existing for no other purpose, than to solicit your willing submission to their authority without protest. Why do you continue to vote for Democrats and Republicans with nothing more to offer than carrying out the shopworn divide and conquer agenda of the elite bankers housed at the Crown Temple in London?

Exploitation is the elites stock-in-trade, formulating scenarios of hope soon degenerating into frantic states of manic depressive sorrow. Why do you think most of the fading baby boom generation, and the now middle-aged Generation X, are among the leading consumers of pharmaceuticals?

Keeping the masses in a constant emotional state of panic and fear makes them much easier to hold under crushing boot. Those of the so-called middle-class, are you really free when demanded to pay increasingly higher taxes, car payments, mortgages, no matter the ideology of the ruling administration in Washington? You may think you own something, but you don’t, the bankers own everything, including those politicians in whom you’ve made grossly ill-advised emotional investments. Why do you continue to bow, support, even cheer, and provide one shred of credence to an enthroned group of pretenders given the legal but unlawful right to call themselves presidents and prime ministers, when the inherent power to govern yourselves is well within your grasp?

That’s okay, scoff, huff, and click off the page, returning to something that satisfies your own petty desires, because that’s probably all you care about anyway, right! Go ahead, watch CNN, FOX, or some other mainstream ‘news’ that will spoon feed reality to you like dosages of pablum.

Many shall surely scoff at the conclusions reached here.

Though this may be the final installment of this particular series of posts (*), that by no means entails any degree of closure. The elite Crown Temple bankers shall continue to exploit the hopes and dreams of the masses, and the people will continue to react with passive acceptance. The ramifications of the information about to be divulged are shockingly tragic, tragic in the sense so many could be fooled for so long. Understanding the nuances of this story, accompanied by the historical backdrop previously provided in the first two installments, is key in deciphering how it is the elites, the Rothschild’s, and their Crown Temple banking minions, maintain their stranglehold over the masses. This, they do, with the systematic creation of historical myths, myths offering hope to the downtrodden, offering transcendence, salvation from the mundane boredom of lives in the throes of quiet desperation, only to later pull the rug out from under.

And why, one might ask, is this systematically done throughout history?

It is done, because the elites possess keen insights into mass human psychology; a narcissistic population constantly distracted and preoccupied with emotionalism, one lacking a penchant for logical and analytical faculties, are far easier to manipulate, and ultimately govern. Again and again, throughout history, they offer the unwashed masses heroic figures to worship and admire; JFK, RFK, MLK, Abraham Lincoln, Joan of Arc. All of these, had one thing in common, they were mythological constructs, created, supported, and funded, installed into place by the elite bankers. So it was, with the creation of Diana, the people’s princess. For a time, she represented a shining beacon, a distracting focal point to keep the masses in thrall to a cult of personality, while behind the scenes, the elites were casting spells, spells that would once again create order out of chaos. Her brief period of mass popularity must be put into context. During this period of time in Britain, the economy was on the skids, with tens of thousands unemployed and unable to find gainful employment, with many of the country’s public services – gas, water, electricity – sold into the hands of private interests.

What better way to pacify the growing disaffected, than to offer a shining princess, a beacon of symbolic hope to pierce the prevailing gloom?

Of course, the media sorcerers, owned and operated by the Rothschild’s, and their Crown Temple banking friends, never bothered to inform the public their country was literally being sold down the Thames. Meanwhile, many thousands of tax burdened, nearly homeless and starving masses swooned over the beautiful princess as she pranced around damask-decked Buckingham palace in her flowing silk gowns.

From the beginning, a meticulously crafted story line was constructed for the character chosen to play the public role of Diana. She was an elite debutante, sold as a modern day Cinderella, swept off her feet by Prince Charles, and summarily donned with supernatural glass slippers.

To many, Diana represented a demigoddess, but, she was not who one thought, for she was merely an actress and, as so many of her ilk had before, she was merely appointed to portray a scripted role.

The history of the royal family is thought to be known to many.

And yet, the public sees only what the media sorcerers want them to see, or to put it more accurately, the people only see what they allow themselves to see. Many, one suspects, subconsciously realize their closely guarded perceptions of this world fully consist of lies derived from the mealy mouths of egregious liars. But, to contemplate the extent of those lies, and the scope of their inherent ramifications, would require too much attention, or, perhaps, considering the inconceivable is too great a psychological burden. For, if most ever considered the extent of the grand illusion, that grotesquely false perception of artificial reality, force fed and instilled from infancy, they would shrink in fear, horrified to find the life they thought they knew, torn asunder into shredded tatters.


To demonstrate more fully the recording of history is nothing more than a magic trick, enacted to transform the perceptions and consciousness of humankind, we shall once again delve into other examples of elite deception. The history of the British monarchy is riddled with clever deceptions involving sleight of hand, and outright faking of deaths. One analyzes patterns in the telling and retelling of history, the same methods of deceptive operation utilized over and over, to the point of utter redundancy. Perhaps, the most telltale sign of this, comes in the form of the mythologizing of Richard III who as a result of the War of the Roses – itself an historically deceptive concoction rife with narrative inconsistencies – magically transformed to Richard VII:  (Kabbalah numerology: III and VII, or three sevens=777, or black jack, you’ve been fooled!).

It is a safe bet that, when the history of a particular bloodline is immortalized, not only in so-called academic annals, but by modern media – a monopolistic monolith controlled by the thirteen, ruling elite Jesuit families – something is truly amiss.

None other than George Orwell put it best: “Whomever controls the past controls the future.”

Princess Diana did not die on that fateful night of August, 31: (August, the eighth month, 31, or 3+1=4, or 8+4=12, or 21=777, black jack, Kabbalah numerology hoax code), because she never existed. She was a character portrayed by Ondine Rothschild, a character dutifully playing out a role on the stage of history, as so many have done before.

While the masses remain transfixed with the action on stage illuminated by blinding rainbows of colorful footlights, they remain forever oblivious to what routinely occurs behind the theatrical curtain, where the genuine political maneuvering takes place.

Not only did the Princess Diana character AKA Ondine Rothschild not die in a tragic car crash, but ear biometric, hand vein pattern and facial recognition analysis clearly confirm she was later resurrected, and is now playing out the role of Prime Minister suspiciously abandoned by David Cameron, Theresa May!

Ondine Rothschild:




Princess Diana Spencer:




PM Theresa May:




In case you dispute that bit of information, one would do well to remember; people routinely lie, computer software possesses no such human compunction.

And now, you may crawl back into your social media womb, where all is warm and safe.

(*) For a more detailed explanation and analysis of the symbolic and occult significance of Diana’s character on the world stage, proceed to Part IV @ https://newsspellcom.org/2018/09/18/diana-the-myth-made-peoples-princess-part-IV/

31 thoughts on “Diana: The Myth Made People’s Princess (Part III)

  1. Well that was a disappointing article. Where’s the proof that Diana is Ondine Rothschild? Where’s the proof that she’s now playing out the role of Theresa May? Hey, maybe she’s actually Donald Trump! I mean, they’re both blond right? I accept that her death was faked and that she wasn’t the person we were told she was but your theory is ridiculous.


    1. Thank you for your interest in Newsspellcom.org., but I in light of your disappointment, one would encourage you to fully investigate the matter yourself and then based on empirical evidence decide rather than choosing to scoff at the hypothetical assertions made with knee-jerk emotionalism.


      1. Allow me to ask, other than the power of suggestion, neural linguistic programming, and actors dressed up as ‘expert’s, do mainstream news sources provide the public any genuine empirical evidence for the claims they make? And yet, you and the masses at large never bother to question or corroborate. Did you read the entire series of articles – did you not observe there exist matching hand/vein patterns and ear bio-metrics? Here’s a suggestion, get the necessary tools and conduct your own investigation to either corroborate or refute what one has asserted, for that is the basis of true empirical and scientific inquiry. And, you’re yet another individual with a generic icon accompanied by some anonymous moniker – suspicious to say the very least, correct?


    1. Surely, someone clever enough to hide behind a faceless and generic icon can provide a greater and in depth analysis than that? Surely, one is aware biographies can be routinely fabricated? Surely, one is cognizant photographs can be shot with lens distortions and altered with photo shop in post-production? And what of comparative hand print/vein analysis from a series of photographs the elite handlers forgot to photo shop proving beyond shadow of doubt both historical characters known to the world as PM Theresa May and Princess Diana were indeed portrayed by the identical host actor should be duly considered and ultimately cannot be denied?

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Was the first Lady Diana an actress as well or was she genuine? Was there an original Theresa May who was replaced by an actress? Which of the Lady Diana actresses is now playing Theresa May?


    1. Thank you for your interest in the material found at Newsspell. Forensic examination indicates the public figures of Lady Diana Spencer and British PM Theresa May are characters portrayed by the same host actor known as Ondine Rothschild. If one is so inclined, it is recommended one please consult the series of articles entitled “How Crown Temple rules America” for a near thorough explanation as to how the actor based reality legally functions through holding corporations operating within a global commercial system allowing for political proxies acting under pseudonyms,


    1. Thank you for your interest in Newsspell. The same thirteen families have not only been ruling over us since time immemorial, they have also managed to monopolize every profitable field of commercial, human endeavor.


    1. Indeed, Charles, You may want to check out the most recent installments posted here at Newsspell. When you do, you shall learn that European royalty represent the crux of the post-modern actor-based-reality phenomenon. Many of them are Hollywood celebrities, pop stars, and even mainstream newscasters in disguise.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Learn to write English!

        “…..you WILL learn that European royalty representS….. ”



      2. wow, they’re hitting you full frontal assault using letters, sentences, and grammar corrections ..tough crowd! ..smiles..
        I usually just read what you put up and follow silently but for some odd reason I am pulled into responding to this one. Carry on!


      3. nutspielcom.forge

        *Novelist/Indepedent researcher/creative writer/free thinker*

        Novelist/independent researcher/creative writer/free thinker/oddball/flake/fruitcake……..



  3. I have went to school & graduated as an esthetician (skin care specialist). This is especially interesting to me bc I know what trickery can be done with regular makeup, no Photoshop. You can make a big nose look smaller and anything a different size just by using lighter or darker makeup. If your eyes aren’t deep set, you can make them look like they are by putting darker skin-colored eye shadow in the crease of your upper eyelid. Take a look at YouTube videos “makeup shading” & “reverse makeup shading” & you’ll see how people can change their entire face. And this stuff you can do with Walmart or rite-aid general normal people makeup. You can do so much more with stage makeup, pancake makeup, & other specialty makeup such as what may be used on the deceased.

    More of what I am thinking…. Diana has fuller lips than Online,
    In the pic where Diana has the fullest lips, she’s wearing a very glossy lip-makeup, & the glossy/shimmer/wet look applied ANYWHERE on the face draws attention to where it is applied bc it catches the light, so you can’t help but look at it. ALSO lipliner can be applied outside the natural lipline, making the lips look a little fuller. ALSO your lips lose fullness & collagen as you age, so all this could account for the difference in lip size. You can see Ondine ONLY wears matte opaque lipcolor makeup, which does NOT catch the light, and may be making her lips look smaller.
    I have definitely read this with an open mind and my opinion is that there’s a possibility Diana and Ondine may be the same. There’s other makeup tricks one can do but I believe this is enough that you can see where I’m coming from… But I’m not sure I’m sold on the PM being the same. She definitely looks like she could be related… But then again, as I am also a former model, I know that a certain pose, camera angle, & lighting can put 20 pounds on you or take it off you, without using Photoshop, & you can make your face look longer or rounder as well. Another factor has to do with how close you are to the camera lens. I’ve heard Ondine has had nose surgery – which may or may not be true, but I’m simply looking at & explaining what is possible, very possible, without Photoshop or surgery, with simple materials that almost anyone can easily access.
    This is very interesting to me bc of my perspective. I’m sure there are other people who also have a unique perspective as well with certain information they may have attained in their life.


  4. I meant to add that Diana does look as if lipliner is applied just outside her natural lipline in the pic where her lips are glossy & pretty.

    Thank you for this article & pictures.

    Ananasha (Elohim Angel language for “thank you” or “gratitude”)


    1. Thank you for graciously demonstrating keen interest in the material presented here at Newsspell. Forgive me, for failing to respond to your reply with greater alacrity. Although you formulate a well-articulated argument designed to raise reasonable doubt regarding the author’s empirically-based assertions – presumably based on both your experiences in the modeling and business world – you’ve merely succeeded in outlining and underscoring the photographic and post/pre-production methodologies which have already been thoroughly touched upon and described throughout previous and subsequent installments. Nevertheless, though you have astutely pointed out the various methodologies utilized to distort ocular perceptions in terms of comparative facial recognition/photographic analysis in the case of the former British PM, and, as well, those used to well-conceal the positive identity of her ‘host actor’, those would not significantly altar or effect the existence of identical biological markers or characteristics identified through vein/hand pattern comparative analysis. Regarding your secondary comment, am I to correctly assume you’ve performed some study of the occult? If so, you may want to consult Part IV of this series of installments to acquire a greater and grander scope regarding the phenomenon of post-modern reality simulation, the thirteen ruling elite Jesuit families, Crown Temple, and the interconnected global network of legal esquires/ international bankers/financiers.


      1. Brb. Gotta grab my thesaurus & educate myself on some of those words. I’m not a writer/author/journalist & I don’t make my living with words, so you know more words than I do, lol.

        Ok I’m back with my thesaurus.

        Hold your horses! I haven’t seen any other installments. This is the first time I’ve dipped my toe in this theory, & this is the first site I’ve done any research on it. I definitely believe that “they” feed us a lot of lies & make distractions for us to focus on, so we become so busy focusing on that, that we aren’t focusing on their major control plans. But there’s so much that it can feel a bit overwhelming to research – where to start? Which one to start with? Which info is genuine & which is doctored? Which is put out by “them” & designed to mislead us to false theories?

        Some people literally dedicate their lives to finding the truth bc there’s so much to go through. That comment I made was after not having read any other article other than this one, & I was saying what I personally know to be true about photography & makeup. So maybe I repeated you. I’m sorry. Everyone else is not as educated as you are in every field that you are educated in. I’m an everyone else, & I was commenting with what I am educated in. I’m really leaning towards believing your theory. I’m not debating bc I don’t know enough about this to debate either way. I have questions! Many questions, that, with honest answers, would help me to form a more solid opinion.

        Idk what the hand vein pattern computer program is you mention so I can’t comment on that. I don’t even know where to begin on the questions bc I’m not educated on that.

        The reason I am not sold on Theresa May being Diana/Ondine is bc the shape of her mouth when she smiles seems different. I believe they could be relatives bc there are a lot of facial similarities, & bc “they” have big families, & so many family members play parts in this big “play”.

        Should I start asking my questions now? Or should I look up whatever other info I can find? Bc there are so many rabbit holes that lead to other rabbit holes… I’ve already taken the red pill, I’ve went down some of those already… So here I go again!

        The answer on if I studied the occult – you can see I do have some familiarity with this stuff. My theory prior to stumbling on this one was that Diana was real & that she was murdered, but it was staged to look like an accident. I remember seeing pictures & film of her sons crying their eyes out. Maybe they were lied to about her death? I was a kid too, I was spending the night with my best friend Amy when the news broke that she died.

        I’m going to research what you suggested & some more too.

        Sorry if I didn’t organize this well. My mind is all over the place thinking about it. I’m schooled in skin, not writing.


  5. You needn’t apologize for attempting to respond with what you’ve considered to be salient points. To my knowledge, you’re one of the first in attempting to do so regarding the premise of this particular article. These widely promoted historical events – like that of Princess Diana’s death – work on dual levels. One – as occult, Shakespearean rituals portrayed by genealogical relations of the thirteen families who also portray Hollywood celebrities, newscasters, politicians, premieres and other public figures of note in all spheres of human endeavor. Two – these rituals are carried out on specific dates in veneration of occult/pagan gods and in accordance with numerological/astral significances. On a purely exoteric level, such events – as the ruling elites and their minions have done for centuries through word-of-mouth and in print form before the advent of mass media and digital technologies – are now widely promoted to the mass public through the television and mass communication medium to not only satisfy and increase profitable commercial interests, but to direct the public’s mass energy in bringing to fruition specific political and social agendas. This has become evident most recently with the MSM’s promotion of the LGBQT/#metoo/feminist/racial divide/climate change propaganda. Regarding the overall global agenda of the thirteen ruling elite families, the economic structures of America, and the West, are being transitioned from industrial centers of material mass production into purely service-based/consumer economies. On an occult/esoteric level, this represents the promotion and spreading of the mass energy of the mother goddess, Isis, in superseding the historically predominant male energy/male patriarchy. I’m happy to hear you are dedicated to further investigation into these matters, and hope you would choose to remain a regular visitor to Newsspell.


    1. You’re correct, Danny, former British PM Theresa May is not Princess Diana, they were both theatrical characters portrayed by the identical host actor, Ondine Rothschild. Tell me, did you bother to peruse the entire article, or was your mind too preoccupied with preconceived notions to fully consider the empirical argumentation?


      1. [apologies if double posted..didnt see it show up first time, but will not attempt again a third time..maybe set up for moderating before posting. It is fine]

        Hi, I am not trying to lend credence to this youtube channel. i just now found it in a search entry of google for images of O Rothschild. https://youtu.be/6RoVNkKjkFE

        Only lends however more credence to the fact that THEY are treating us as cretins.

        Even though THEY are the Cretans which lend credence to liars, thieves, murderers, rapists, debauchery and all because they are jealous that they can’t light up a room like we can. They can of course use artificial lighting and appear larger than life on the big screen, but our screen is much bigger when we aren’t busy wearing human grab and watching their shows.

        I’m taking liberties with words here of course. I am always amused at the depths of deception they need to actually continue to build their false claim of property rights when in fact they themselves are in violation of their own Copyright statues and bylaws.

        You can claim the body, sure, but taking my ‘energy and light’ to be used for your own sustainability is a crime.

        You as in THEM, plural, not you newsspell.com, not you reader, unless you reader are one of them keeping an eye on things here. [or running interference to throw the occasional false story to discredit the whole story, of which I highly doubt. They simply know we are too programmed to care [APATHY] and too willing to continue allowing them to rule over us through ignorant ritual, ceremony, praise and which transmutes into CONSENT.

        Just my opinion here, not trying to gain a thing by posting it other than to add to the youtube with my own opinion piece.
        Hope you are alright with that newsspell.com.
        Also I just want to add I do not need proof to know they are doing this fraud through character acting for nefarious reasons. I see proof daily, or I used too, in the mirror.

        have a great rest of your day.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. There is no need to apologize for choosing to express your opinion here at Newsspell. In a roundabout way, you’ve underscored the primary point I’ve been articulating since the inception of this blog. The thirteen, ruling elite families and their court of Crown Temple bankers are still ruling over the proletariat by proxy. They choose to govern by proxy – with what I’ve termed Reality Simulation – to remain clandestine, and to maintain the illusion of democracy and self-determination among the proletariat. However, rule by stealth and subversion, while utilizing fiat money, and with psychological warfare through their media/entertainment complex – so they’ve discovered over the centuries – is far more effective and profitable – in the long-term – than with occupations of standing armies equipped with guns and bombs.


  6. The last woman to play Lady Diana was Ondine Rothschild. Theresa May is a Rothschild minion, but she looks nothing like Ondine de Rothschild.


    1. Thanks for you interest in Newsspell. I must concede, despite growing levels of sophistication, facial recognition is still somewhat unreliable in terms of accuracy. This is why ear biometrics are often the ultimate determining factor in making a positive identification. In the case of PM May, her facial geometry has been modified with strategically placed prosthetics and makeup. Most of her still images indicate lens distortion, photo shop and lightning angles have also been applied. However, one must also consider, vein/hand pattern analysis is consistent between Lady Diana, Rothschild and May.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s